Updating January's Rare S&P 500 Setup

THIRD CONSECUTIVE MONTHLY CLOSE

As described in detail below, when the S&P 500 closed above the monthly Bollinger Band centerline at the end of January, it aligned the present day with favorable historical probabilities and also provided some distance from setups in the 1974, 2001, and 2008 bear markets.

The end of March 2019 brought the third consecutive monthly S&P 500 close above the monthly Bollinger Band centerline. Twelve of the thirteen similar historical cases, covered on February 19, also went on to print three consecutive closes above the monthly Bollinger Band centerline; the exception was the 6/30/1960 case, which gave up the centerline in the second month. The table below shows S&P 500 performance in the remaining twelve historical cases following the third consecutive close above the monthly Bollinger Band centerline (similar to what occurred at the end of March 2019).

short-takes-ciovacco-bb-setups2.png

From a longer-term perspective, three things jump off the table above:

  • The 1957 case reminds us to keep an open mind about all outcomes, including another significant pullback in the S&P 500.

  • The odds favor satisfying gains over the next two years with tolerable drawdowns and pullbacks. Over 90% of the historical cases posted positive returns looking out one to two years.

  • To capture the historical returns above, investors had to endure normal bouts of market volatility and emotional swings from time to time. This analysis tells us very little about the next three hours or three days.

JANUARY CLOSE PROVIDED INSIGHT

The chart below shows the S&P 500 closed above the monthly Bollinger Band centerline (a.k.a. center band) on January 31, 2019. The January print occurred after the S&P 500 closed below the centerline in December, but above the lower Bollinger Band.

BB 2019.png

1973-74 BEAR MARKET

As shown in the 1973-74 version of the same chart, notice how the S&P 500 was unable to recapture and close above the Bollinger Band centerline during the entire bear market. Unlike the 2019 case (thus far), the S&P 500 closed below the lower Bollinger Band in November 1973.

short-takes-ciovacco-bb6.png

DOT-COM BEAR MARKET

The same can be said for the 2000-02 bear market; the S&P 500 never closed back above the Bollinger Band centerline after closing below it in Q4 2000. As shown below, really bad things happened after Q4 2000. Unlike the 2019 case, the S&P 500 closed below the lower Bollinger Band in February 2001.

BB 2000.png

FINANCIAL CRISIS BEAR MARKET

After stocks peaked in October 2007, the S&P 500 closed below the monthly Bollinger Band centerline in January 2008 and never closed back above it during the painful bear market. Unlike the 2019 case, the S&P 500 closed below the lower Bollinger Band in June 2008.

BB 2007.png

WHAT DOES HISTORY SAY ABOUT THE RECENT INVERSION IN THE YIELD CURVE?

On Friday, March 22, the shorter end of the yield curve inverted, prompting analysis and commentary that heavily slanted toward bearish economic and market outcomes.

yield-curve-inversion-ciovacco.png

This week’s stock market video takes a look at every single case of similar yield curve inversion dating back to 1982 and shows exactly what happened in the stock market over the following year. After reviewing the facts, you can draw your own conclusions.

JANUARY 2019 LOOK WAS RARE

It is relatively rare for the S&P 500 to move from above the monthly Bollinger Band centerline, close below the centerline while remaining above the lower Bollinger Band, and subsequently print a monthly close back above the centerline, which is what just happened in 2018-2019.

Dating back to 1950, there were thirteen similar looks that appeared on the S&P 500’s monthly chart. As shown in the table below, the bias for stocks over the next two years was favorable. The table below appeared in the original February post and aligns with the 2019 market as of 1/31/2019.

short-takes-bollingerbands-mm-b.png

CASES WITH BREADTH THRUSTS

The monthly Bollinger Band setup described above is rare. It is interesting to note that two of the Bollinger band cases, 1954 and 1991, basically coincided with an extremely rare 10-day breadth thrust that was covered on January 21, 2019. Therefore, we have three cases that feature both the Bollinger Band setup and rare breadth thrust: 1954, 1991, and 2019.

The look of the monthly chart on the last trading day of January 1954 is similar to the rare look found at the end of January 2019.

short-takes-bb-1991-2B.png

The ten-day breadth thrust was completed on January 25, 1954, four trading days before the monthly Bollinger Band setup went into the books. Similar to 2019, price was near a flat-to-downish orange 200-day moving average.

short-takes-bb-1954-B2.png

The 1954 case that featured both setups was followed by very satisfying gains in the S&P 500 Index.

short-takes-ciovacco-capital-spx-1991-btC.png

1991 DUAL SETUP CASE

The look of the monthly chart on the last trading day of January 1991 is similar to the rare look found at the end of January 2019.

short-takes-bb-1991-2.png

The ten-day breadth thrust was completed on February 4, 1991, or two trading days after the monthly Bollinger Band setup went into the books. Similar to 2019, price was near a flat-to-downish orange 200-day moving average.

short-takes-bb-1991-B2.png

The 1991 case that featured both setups was followed by very satisfying gains in the S&P 500 Index.

short-takes-ciovacco-capital-spx-1991-btB.png

2015: WEAKER TRENDS ARE MORE PRONE TO FAILURE

The 2015 Bollinger Band case reminds us a significant giveback remains a possibility in 2019. The 2015 monthly BB setup was unable to hold above the centerline and turned out to be a head fake.

short-takes-bb-2015-A.png

Two other reminders come from the 2015 case:

Markets with still-vulnerable trend profiles are more prone to reversals, givebacks, and setup failures.

Closing above the orange 200-day moving average is far from an “all clear” signal in the stock market. In 2015, the S&P 500 closed above the 200-day for eight trading sessions, before falling 13.30%.

SPXCCV67B.png

MORAL OF THE STORY

Having something concrete and measurable that differentiates 2018-2019 from three of the greatest percentage decline bear markets in history (73-74, 00-02, 07-09) speaks favorably to bull/bear probabilities in 2019.

However, the 1957 and 2015 cases remind us head fakes and lower lows are still in the realm of possibility. In those periods, the stay above the monthly Bollinger Band centerline was short lived, meaning intermediate-term concerns would increase in 2019 if the S&P 500 prints a monthly close back below the Bollinger Band centerline, which currently sits at 2723.

S&P 500's Breakout Attempt

MARKET WAS A BIT EXTENDED SHORT-TERM

Monday’s session saw the first close above the S&P 500’s upper Bollinger Band (purple arrow) since the current rally began in late December 2018. In early February, the market approached the upper band and then took a very brief pause (blue arrow). Tuesday’s session featured an intraday reversal that started from above the upper band (red arrow). As of this writing, the bigger picture remains constructive. We used the extended short-term look as an opportunity to lock down some gains in a hybrid/growth position, which allows us some flexibility for reallocation if/when the market finds its footing.

short-takes-ciovacco-spy-bb.png

RECENT BREAKOUT HOLDING THUS FAR

Three weeks ago the S&P 500 had just cleared the 200-day moving average (shown in red below) and was approaching the highs made in Q4 2018 (blue horizontal line). The chart below first appeared in a February 25 post titled “Markets Hovering Near Important Guideposts”.

short-takes-ciovacco-spx Feb 25 2019.png

The same chart during Tuesday’s session (below) shows the S&P 500 is currently trying to hold above three relevant areas. The market appears to have successfully retested the 200-day earlier this month (A). The orange box (B), thus far, has done little to slow the market’s strong advance off the 2018 low. Last Friday, the market closed above the blue line (C) for the first time and nailed down the 3rd consecutive close above the Q4 highs during Tuesday’s session. The blue line sits at 2813; Tuesday’s close was 2832.

short-takes-ciovacco-spx MAR 19.png

In the chart above, the longer the S&P 500 can hold above A, B, and C, the easier it is to decrease exposure to the hybrid/defensive side of our portfolios and/or add to our existing growth-oriented positions. It should be noted, even under longer-term bullish conditions, the S&P 500 may come back and retest the horizontal blue line which sits at 2813. A retest could take place in a matter of days or could come weeks/months later. Wednesday’s Fed statement and press conference could usher in some relevant information impacting the breakout one way or another.

WANING RELATIVE TRENDS

While the S&P 500 Low-Volatility ETF (SPLV) has performed well and is still hovering near new highs, the conviction to own more-conservative S&P 500 stocks has been waning. If the S&P 500’s breakout above 2813 holds (TBD), the relative demand for SPLV could decrease further.

short-takes-ciovacco-solv-spy-1.png

The same concepts apply to real estate investment trusts (REITS). Viewed in isolation, IYR is still hovering near new highs, but signs of relative weakness are evident on the chart below.

short-takes-ciovacco-iyr-spy-22.png

Viewed in isolation, gold-mining stocks (GDX) remain in an uptrend relative to the low that was made in 2018. However, the relative trend has not made a new high since late December.

short-takes-ciovacco-gdx-spy-22.png

The “lower conviction to own defensive assets” theme carries over to the bonds (TLT) vs. stocks (SPY) chart shown below.

short-takes-ciovacco-TLT-SPY-22.png

MORAL OF THE STORY

The market’s recent short-term extended condition and Wednesday’s Fed meeting allow for a pause to see how things play out near 2813 on the S&P 500. Since it is always good to understand a wide range of outcomes, there is still a small gap the market may want to revisit near 2747.

short-takes-ciovacco-spy-bb-C.png

LONGER-TERM OUTLOOK

The longer-term outlook remains constructive as outlined in last Friday’s video below.

This post is written for clients of Ciovacco Capital Management and describes our approach in generic terms. It is provided to assist clients with basic concepts, rather than specific strategies or levels. The same terms of use disclaimers used in our weekly videos apply to all Short Takes posts and tweets on the CCM Twitter Feed, including the text and images above.