Key Levels For A Trend Flip

We are working on some long-term research projects that can assist us going forward. However, it might be helpful to pass along some info related to the current market.

As demonstrated via numerous historical examples in this week’s video, if the market is going to reestablish a long-term bullish trend, there is typically time to adjust allocations along the way. Our goal is to put additional capital in harm’s way when the odds are more favorable relative to our timeframe.

Simple math tells us in order for the generic moving averages/trends to start turning up, one of two basic things needs to happen:

ONE: Price needs to rise above and hold above the 2630 to 2750 range.

TWO: The market needs to move sideways for a few weeks/months allowing the data to settle in at lower levels, which is typically how a sustainable bottom is formed.

short-takes-Jan-15-2018-a.png

To illustrate concepts, let’s assume the S&P 500 shoots straight up and closes above 2750 today. As shown in the version of the chart below, that means price would move above a cluster of moving averages that all still have negative slopes. As shown in this week’s video, the odds of a rally failing are higher when price moves above downward-sloping moving averages. The key word in the previous sentence is odds. Does the current setup look like a high-probability area to add to the growth side of the portfolio (see blue arrow below)?

It is entirely possible price shoots to the moon and stocks rally strongly for two more years, but in that scenario there would be plenty of time for the data to improve and for us to migrate back to a full growth allocation. We do not attempt to trade countertrend moves in an established downtrend. We want to move in a prudent, patient, logical, and data-based manner, rather than based on the fear of missing out.

Thus, if really good things are going to happen for a long period of time (a favorable period to have our capital in harm’s way), one of the two items noted above needs to occur. During Tuesday’s session the S&P 500 was trading at 2611, or below the 2630-2750 range noted above. Therefore, as of this writing, neither of the two things that need to happen have happened.

January 8 concepts and levels remain relevant:

“Thus far, the current oversold rally seems to align with the historical cases. Therefore, it would not be surprising to see the S&P 500 rally back to the 2600 to 2670 area before retesting the December 2018 low sometime in the next three to six weeks (late January to mid-February) - all TBD.“

Our purpose here is not to forecast or favor any outcome, but rather to assess the current risk-reward environment. The current environment features downtrends on multiple timeframes. Nothing has materially changed relative to our timeframe since the publication of last Friday’s video.

It is extremely important to note, the generic moving averages above are used to illustrate basic concepts; they are not the data points used by the model to guide our decisions.

This post is written for clients of Ciovacco Capital Management and describes our approach in generic terms. It is provided to assist clients with basic concepts, rather than specific strategies or levels. The same terms of use disclaimers used in our weekly videos apply to all Short Takes posts and tweets on the CCM Twitter Feed, including the text and images above.

Reversals And Countertrend Moves Typically Take Time To Develop

HUMAN NATURE AND PLUNGES

Since investor psychology tends to be similar after a sharp plunge in the stock market, subsequent bottoms and/or countertrend rallies often share similar characteristics. The first three cases below all show investor behavior following a sharp 20% plunge in a non-recessionary environment.

The 1987 case featured a sharp oversold rally of 18.82% and a retest of the original low 45 calendar days later.

short-takes-ciovacco-1-7-2019-1987.png

The 1998 case featured a sharp oversold rally of 13.42% and a retest of the original low 37 calendar days later.

short-takes-ciovacco-1-7-2019-1998.png

The 2011 case featured a sharp oversold rally of 11.73%% and a retest of the original low 56 calendar days later.

short-takes-ciovacco-1-7-2019-2011.png

RECESSIONARY CASE

As we have noted in the past, the initial plunge in 2007 also shares some similarities to 2018-19. In the 2008 case, the plunge was followed by a 9.92% rally. The previous plunge low was retested 54 days later. Following the successful retest, the S&P 500 rallied 13.43% before the countertrend rally ended on May 16, 2008.

short-takes-ciovacco-1-7-2019-2008.png

MORAL OF THE STORY

Respecting 2019 will carve out a unique path, it is possible human nature will once again produce a period of volatility and consolidation in the wake of the December 2018 plunge. Thus far, the current oversold rally seems to align with the historical cases shown above. Therefore, it would not be surprising to see the S&P 500 rally back to the 2600 to 2670 area before retesting the December 2018 low sometime in the next three to six weeks (late January to mid-February) - all TBD.

short-takes-jan-7-2019-spx.png

HOW MARKETS/PROFILES TYPICALLY TURN FOLLOWING PLUNGE

When markets plunge, profiles tilt heavily to the bearish-trend side of the ledger, which is still the case in 2019. For any type of sustainable rally to take place, it typically takes time for the data/trends to stabilize/consolidate, allowing them an opportunity to turn back up after a retest of the original low. The basic concept is illustrated via the 50-day moving average in the 2008 case below. The market’s profile/hard data is extremely weak near the first low (red arrow). After the retest of the low, the period of consolidation/confusion allowed the data to stabilize and subsequently turn back up (blue arrow).

short-takes-retest-math.png

Our purpose is not to forecast any outcome in 2019, but rather to understand and respect a wide range of outcomes, including a V-bottom or failed retest of the December low, followed by much lower lows. The market remains in a downtrend until proven otherwise.

MORE DETAIL IN VIDEO